Healthcare

President Trump intends to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Republicans in Congress are battling over legislation. And the Department of Health and Human Services is revisiting many Obama-era rules.

The Blind Side In Trump’s War On The Administrative State

4/17/17  //  Commentary

Neomi Rao’s nomination to serve as Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) is part of Trump and Bannon’s war on the administrative state.

Leah Litman

U.C. Irvine School of Law

Ian Samuel

Harvard Law School

Uncertainty (Still) Has Consequences – and Trump Knows It

4/13/17  //  Quick Reactions

Yesterday, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, President Trump admitted that he's toying with the idea of blowing up the Affordable Care Act in order to extract concessions from Democrats.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

Rachel Sachs

Washington University Law School

Updates | The Week of April 3, 2017

4/9/17  //  Daily Update

Republicans are still figuring out what to do in the face of their healthcare defeat.

Updates | The Week of March 27, 2017

4/2/17  //  Daily Update

Last week saw the demise of Republican efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. But this week saw concerns that the Trump Administration could nonetheless cause the ACA to implode. On Take Care, Nick Bagley and Rachel Sachs analyzed this possibility.

What Happens Next for the ACA?

3/28/17  //  Commentary

President Trump has said that “the best thing we can do politically speaking is let Obamacare explode,” and there’s a lot he can do to make that explosion a reality. Here is what you need to know about what might come next.

Rachel Sachs

Washington University Law School

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

Updates | The Week of March 20, 2017

3/26/17  //  Daily Update

As the President and Speaker attempted unsuccessfully to glue together a coalition to pass their Affordable Care Act (ACA) replacement plan, Take Care contributors examined its constitutionality in reference to arguments made against the ACA and looked at the consequences of the administration’s indecision on health policy.

Take Care

Is The GOP ACA Repealer Unconstitutional on Federalism Grounds?

3/24/17  //  Commentary

Abbe Gluck explains that, ironically, the GOP proposal to repeal the Affordable Care Act in the name of returning authority over health care to the states has potentially serious constitutional issues on federalism grounds.

Take Care

Confusion Over The Essential Health Benefits

3/24/17  //  Quick Reactions

Last night, House Republicans released the text of the final manager’s amendment to the American Health Care Act. If it becomes law, the individual insurance market will likely collapse nationwide in 2018.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

NFIB v. Sebelius As Anti-Canon (a.k.a. This Administration’s Galling Constitutional Hypocrisy)

3/23/17  //  In-Depth Analysis

The Trump administration is engaged in stunning constitutional hypocrisy. Measured against conservatives' professed commitment to "liberty" and "freedom," there is no serious distinction to be drawn between Obamacare and Trump's American Health Care Act.

Leah Litman

U.C. Irvine School of Law

The CBO-CBA Analogy, or What Wonks Could Learn from Each Other

3/17/17  //  In-Depth Analysis

Republican criticism of CBO's report on the American Health Care Act echoes long-standing criticism of cost-benefit analysis at OIRA. There are lessons to be learned here.

Jennifer Nou

University of Chicago Law School

Uncertainty Has Consequences: Health Care Reform Edition

3/22/17  //  Commentary

Uncertainty created by presidential action can be destructive. That is painfully clear in the healthcare field, where President Trump's vague, confusing, and ever-changing policies are already causing harm.

Rachel Sachs

Washington University Law School

Secretary Price Can’t Fix The CBO Score By Regulating

3/16/17  //  Commentary

HHS Secretary Price says the CBO report on the American Health Care Act is not believable because he will reduce costs through regulatory changes. Don't be fooled.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

The “One In, Two Out” EO Is Now Largely A Publicity Stunt

3/17/17  //  Commentary

Trump proudly describes it as a regulation buster, but OIRA has effectively neutered his widely-derided executive order

Rachel Sachs

Washington University Law School

Reliance Defenses in the Trump Era and Beyond

3/23/17  //  Commentary

The transition to President Trump has massively shifted federal enforcement priorities. Does the Constitution protect people who relied on Obama's immigration, healthcare, or marijuana policies?

Zachary Price

U.C. Hastings College of the Law

Republican (and Democratic) Hypocrisy on Faithful Execution

3/17/17  //  Commentary

President Obama pushed the limits of enforcement discretion. Trump may be worse. Will anyone check him if he is?

Zachary Price

U.C. Hastings College of the Law