Contributors

Nick Bagley

Professor of Law

University of Michigan Law School

Professor Nicholas Bagley teaches and writes in the areas of administrative law, regulatory theory, and health law. Prior to joining the Law School faculty, he was an attorney with the appellate staff in the Civil Division at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he argued a dozen cases before the U.S. Courts of Appeals and acted as lead counsel in many more. Professor Bagley also served as a law clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens of the U.S. Supreme Court and to the Hon. David S. Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Professor Bagley holds a BA in English from Yale University and received his JD, summa cum laude, from New York University School of Law. Before entering law school, he joined Teach For America and taught eighth-grade English at a public school in South Bronx. Professor Bagley's work has appeared in the Harvard Law Review, the Columbia Law Review, the Georgetown Law Journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law. His article, "Centralized Oversight of the Regulatory State," which he coauthored with Richard Revesz, was selected as the best article in the field in 2006 by the American Bar Association's Section on Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice. In August 2010, Professor Bagley testified before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts about agency capture. In 2012, he was the recipient of the Law School's L. Hart Wright Award for Excellence in Teaching. He is a frequent contributor toThe Incidental Economist​, a prominent health policy blog.

 

READ OFFICIAL BIO

Subscribe For Updates

Taking a Dive on Risk Adjustment

7/9/18  //  Commentary

The Trump administration says that an adverse court ruling gives it no choice but to suspend some crucial payments under the Affordable Care Act. I don't buy it, and you shouldn't either.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

A puzzle about standing, resolved.

6/26/18  //  Commentary

Do the courts even have jurisdiction to hear the latest lawsuit seeking to undo the Affordable Care Act?

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

The severability question is not hard.

6/25/18  //  Commentary

When Congress repealed the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate penalty, it left the rest of the law intact. The courts should respect that choice and not get drawn in to the relentless campaign against Obamacare.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

The case that could end the Texas lawsuit.

6/15/18  //  Commentary

A brief from the American Medical Association flags a Fifth Circuit case that seems to dispose of the constitutional argument in the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

Strange Bedfellows in the Texas Lawsuit Over the Affordable Care Act

6/14/18  //  Commentary

A bipartisan group of law professors, including the two of us, has filed a brief challenging the claim that the Affordable Care Act should be invalidated.

Abbe Gluck

Yale Law School

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School

A Big Loss for Insurers at the Federal Circuit

6/14/18  //  Commentary

The opinion is a $12 billion setback for insurers seeking money they're owed under the Affordable Care Act. But the costs of being cavalier about our debts extend far beyond this arcane fight.

Nick Bagley

University of Michigan Law School