//  6/24/19  //  Quick Reactions

In a surprise, the Supreme Court agreed this morning to hear cases arising out of the risk corridor mess. At issue is $12 billion in federal money, and the case’s outcome will hinge on what Congress meant when it placed limits on the use of appropriated funds in an effort to sabotage the Affordable Care Act.

The Federal Circuit held that Congress, in placing those limits, qualified an earlier promise made in the ACA to make risk corridor payments to insurers that lost big on the exchanges. As I’ve explained many times, I think that decision is wrong. We’ll see if the Supreme Court agrees.

I’m on the road, so a longer recap of the background and the litigation will have to wait. But I’ve been writing about the appropriations battle since 2014, and I thought I’d provide some resources if you’re interested in learning more about the case.

  • Here’s my take on the Federal Circuit decision that the Supreme Court will review. It’s a short and crisp description of the key issues in the case, and offers too my views about why the Federal Circuit got this one wrong.
  • Craig Garthwaite and I put the litigation into its broader context—the full faith and credit of the U.S. government—in this New York Times op-ed.
  • I discuss the litigation at some length in this Pennsylvania Law Review piece laying out my view that
  • I’ve got a piece in the New England Journal of Medicine discussing rumors that the Obama administration wanted to settle the cases when they were still in the Court of Federal Claims.
  • And here’s my first piece from May 2014 on the whole fiasco—titled “Does the Risk Corridor Program Have a Fatal Technical Flaw?”

@nicholas_bagley


Versus Trump: Going to Church In Times of COVID

12/7/20  //  Commentary

On this week's Versus Trump, Charlie and Jason discuss the recent Supreme Court decisions requiring states to allow in-person religious services even while other gatherings can be banned. The pair gently disagree about how hard or easy these cases are. Listen now!

Charlie Gerstein

Civil Rights Corps

Trump Judges Strike Down Bans on Conversion Therapy

11/25/20  //  In-Depth Analysis

The 11th Circuit held that laws banning conversion therapy — a brutal practice that significantly increases depression and suicide among LGBTQ youth — violate speech rights. The decision signals how Trump-appointed judges could weaponize the First Amendment to roll back civil rights.

Take Care

Versus Trump: Legal Update + The GSA Travesty

11/17/20  //  Commentary

On this week's Versus Trump, Charlie and Jason discuss the status of Trump's legal challenges to the election (going nowhere) and the Trump Administration's dangerous and illegal refusal to designate Biden as the President-elect and therefore give his team resources for a smooth transition. Listen now!

Charlie Gerstein

Civil Rights Corps