//  4/5/18  //  Quick Reactions

While at Harvard Law School on Tuesday, I delivered a talk entitled "The Legal Resistance to Trump."  You can watch it here.  I am grateful to the HLS Forum for hosting this event. 

I had five primary goals in my talk:

(1) to describe respects in which the legal response to Trump is unique; 

(2) to explain why we've already seen such an extraordinary barrage of litigation against Trump;

(3) to identify strategic objectives common to many Trump-related lawsuits; 

(4) to evaluate the judicial response to suits against the Trump Administration; and 

(5) to warn against fantastical expectations that lawyers will save American democracy.

As you'll see, I was less interested in the details of any single litigation than in extrapolating cross-cutting themes, lessons, and strategies from several dozen lawsuits. The talk is a reflection of my ever-evolving perspective on the role that lawyers can (and should) play in seeking to defend democracy in the age of Trump. I hope you enjoy it and I welcome your feedback


Versus Trump: California X Trump

3/7/19  //  In-Depth Analysis

On this week's episode of Versus Trump, Charlie and Jason discuss a new lawsuit from California challenging new regulations regarding Title X, an important federal family planning program. Listen now!

Charlie Gerstein

Civil Rights Corps

Jason Harrow

Equal Citizens

The Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

3/1/19  //  Commentary

With the introduction of the new VRAA, the House is undertaking the long overdue task of responding to Shelby County.

Travis Crum

University of Chicago

Against Establishment Clause Concession

2/28/19  //  In-Depth Analysis

There are reasons to worry about whether certain liberal justices on the Supreme Court fully appreciate that we are at an inflection point in the history of the Religion Clause

Nelson Tebbe

Brooklyn Law School

Micah Schwartzman

University of Virginia School of Law