//  4/5/18  //  Quick Reactions

While at Harvard Law School on Tuesday, I delivered a talk entitled "The Legal Resistance to Trump."  You can watch it here.  I am grateful to the HLS Forum for hosting this event. 

I had five primary goals in my talk:

(1) to describe respects in which the legal response to Trump is unique; 

(2) to explain why we've already seen such an extraordinary barrage of litigation against Trump;

(3) to identify strategic objectives common to many Trump-related lawsuits; 

(4) to evaluate the judicial response to suits against the Trump Administration; and 

(5) to warn against fantastical expectations that lawyers will save American democracy.

As you'll see, I was less interested in the details of any single litigation than in extrapolating cross-cutting themes, lessons, and strategies from several dozen lawsuits. The talk is a reflection of my ever-evolving perspective on the role that lawyers can (and should) play in seeking to defend democracy in the age of Trump. I hope you enjoy it and I welcome your feedback


How Nervous Should You Be About Election Day?

11/2/20  //  Commentary

I'm pretty nervous. But there’s also no reason to think that the rule of law has been entirely eroded in America in 2020. So far, the center has held.

Versus Trump: The Law Headed Into The Election

11/2/20  //  Commentary

Will this be the last Versus Trump before Trump loses reelection? Who knows, but, on this week’s episode, Jason and Charlie discuss key theories that will shape which votes count. Listen now!

Charlie Gerstein

Civil Rights Corps

Kavanaugh's Wisconsin Opinion Flunks Originalist Test of Constitution's Text and History

10/30/20  //  In-Depth Analysis

Brianne Gorod & Charlie Miller: Contrary to Justice Kavanaugh’s suggestion, there is nothing sacrosanct about November 3, and no requirement that the country must know the victor of the presidential election that night.

Brianne J. Gorod

Constitutional Accountability Center