Take Care has launched a new podcast: "Versus Trump." Amicus briefs are flooding into cases challenging the revised travel ban. The March for Science is this Saturday. The Trump Administration has continued to bend and break ethics rules. The Treasury Secretary has said tax reform plans will be released "very soon." President Trump appears to have returned his focus to passing a healthcare law. Trump's environmental policies have been besieged in court. Questions about Russian hacking and influence persist.
NEW PODCAST: VERSUS TRUMP
Take Care is pleased to announce the launch of its new podcast, Versus Trump. Each episode of the new podcast will discuss the ways that the Trump Administration is breaking the law and what people are doing about it. Versus Trump will feature in-depth discussion and explanation of one or two topics and interviews with people who have unique perspectives on the fight against the Trump Administration. You can listen to the first episode here, and subscribe here with any podcast player or here in iTunes.
President Trump’s travel ban violates the Establishment Clause principle that government is forbidden from acting with animus toward a religious group, argues Joshua Matz for Take Care.
The Trump Administration is attempting to spread disinformation in service of its anti-immigration agenda, argue Leah Litman and Helen Murillo for Take Care.
Texas state legislators are cracking down on immigration in bills threatening state funding for localities that fail to cooperate with federal immigration officers, notes Ann Beeson (NYT).
Attorney General Sessions’ argument that sanctuary cities violate federal law is disingenuous and his motives purely political, argues Christopher Lasch (Jurist).
Sergio Alonso Lopez died last week in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody, the sixth person this year (Rewire).
A new report on U.S. immigration details demographics, public opinion, and federal, state, and local enforcement (Center for American Progress).
President Trump and Secretary Tillerson should not remain silent on Chenchen human rights abuses against gay men, argues the Human Rights Campaign.
The upcoming March for Science is an opportunity to stand up for the protection of evidence-based research, critical to the protection of reproductive rights, argues Lynn Paltrow (Rewire).
Presidential candidates’ free speech rights should be protected and the claims of incitement probably don’t pass constitutional muster, argues Lee Rowland (ACLU).
When it looked as though Trump may lose the election, a Russian think tank suggested highlighting voter fraud in order to undermine confidence is the U.S. electoral system (Election Law Blog).
Kris Kobach seeks a stay from a judicial order to hand over documents from his meeting with President-elect Trump to an organization that argues his lobbying Trump to change federal law would amount to an admission that he cannot currently enforce the Kansas voter ID law (Election Law Blog).
Individuals and groups with special interests donated vast sums to President Trump’s inauguration, documents the New York Times.
JUSTICE & SAFETY
Although the Trump Administration’s criminal justice moves to date has been largely symbolic, they evidence a clear turn back to the tough-on-crime policies of the 1990s, argues a new report detailing criminal justice in President Trump’s first 100 days (Brennan Center for Justice).
Despite promising a plan within 90 days, President Trump’s cybersecurity plan is nowhere in sight (Politico).
The Department of Justice has prepared criminal charges to seek the arrest of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange (CNN).
Given President Trump’s signals that he has given the military greater latitude, military leaders should consider the pragmatic reasons for strict rules of engagement, argues Benjamin Haas (Just Security).
Unilateral humanitarian intervention like that in Syria is illegal and potentially criminal, argues Kevin Jon Heller (Opinio Juris).
The ongoing North Korean threat requires pressure on China and military restraint from President Trump, argues Nicholas Kristof (NYT).
The Trump Administration must navigate multiple land mines on the horizon in the United States’ relationship with Iran to avoid crisis, explains Trita Parsi (NYT).
Iran’s foreign minister responded with charges of U.S. hypocrisy after Secretary Tillerson publicly criticized the country while the administration nevertheless certified Iranian compliance with the nuclear deal (Politico).
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The case for standing in the CREW Emoluments suit against President Trump is much stronger now, but not without issues, writes Matthew Stephenson (Global Anticorruption Blog).
To preserve integrity and fairness, White House has been urged to issue a robust policy imposing restrictions on White House staff contacts with other agencies regarding matters involving specific parties (United to Protect Democracy).
Analysis continues of contribution disclosures to President Trump’s inaugural committee.
The President’s greatest flaw, E.J. Dionne Jr. writes, “Is his autocratic assumption that he is above the expectations that apply to us normal humans” (WaPo).
Attorney general Jeff Sessions and HHS Secretary Tom Price may have to either resign or defend a law they previously called unconstitutional, observes Michael Cannon at Cato.
Republican Congressmen, including HHS Secretary Price, have been “flouting” a “cardinal” fundraising ethics rule, charge Lee Fang and Nick Sturgey at The Intercept.
The administration’s decision on Exxon’s requested waiver from Russian sanctions should be a “no-brainer,” says Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY): “an unequivocal no” (The Hill).
An environmental group filed suit challenging the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act, which Congress used to repeal a Department of Interior rule protecting Alaskan wildlife (The Hill).
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin teased the release of comprehensive individual and corporate tax reforms “very soon” (WSJ).
President Trump has a powerful tool to lower pharmaceutical prices already at his disposal, says Prof. Tim Wu: imported drugs. (NYT).
Analysis continues of proposed and anticipated changes in coal policy.
Chemical companies are asking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set aside an Obama-era study on the deleterious effects of some pesticides on animal health (The Hill).
The EPA doesn’t have the legal authority to delay implementation of its methane emissions regs for the oil and gas industry, environmental groups are arguing (ClimateWire).
Commentary continues on the Trump Administration’s relationship with science, in advance of this weekend’s March for Science.
The federal hiring freeze is costly, disruptive, and does not make government smaller, argues Rep. Anthony Brown (D-MD) at The Hill.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is right that the public schooling system is a dead end for innovation, writes Neal McCluskey at Cato.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to eliminate business broadband price caps, potentially increasing prices for small businesses in rural areas (Ars Technica).
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai met with tech companies this week to solicit feedback on pulling back net neutrality (NYT).
The new Financial Choice Act is more like a Bank Protection Act, Jeff Sovern charges at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog.
CHECKS & BALANCES
The National Security Agency (NSA) and U.S. Cyber Command should be split, according to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), top Democrat of the House Intelligence Committee (The Hill).
The government released its annual FISA Court report for calendar year 2016.
States’ requiring political candidates to publically disclose tax returns to get on the ballot violates the Equal Protection Clause, Gerard Magliocca writes at Concurring Opinions.
Fearing a DOJ crackdown on marijuana companies, legalization advocates are pushing Congress to pass legislation protecting companies that follow state law (The Hill).
A Putin-linked Russian government think tank developed a plan to hand the 2016 presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine confidence in American democracy (Reuters).
President Trump is poised to miss a self-imposed deadline Thursday to release a report on Russian hacking (The Hill).
Did Russian interference in the 2016 election violate international law? What about the planting of fake news? Two Penn Law panels featuring NSA Director General Michael Hayden discussed these questions and more (video and coverage from Lawfare).
And that's our update today! Thanks for reading. We cover a lot of ground, so our updates are inevitably a partial selection of relevant legal commentary.
If you have any feedback, please let us know here.
There has been extensive analysis of impeachment, obstruction of justice, the propriety of actions at DOJ and the FBI, the special prosecutor, and connections between the Trump Campaign and Russia. It has been reported that President Trump's lawyers sought to avoid the requirement that Trump personally certify the truth of his financial disclosures. DOJ and ICE have invoked new and controversial arguments to target immigrants and refugees (and their lawyers). A constitutional challenge to the CFPB will be reheard en banc before the D.C. Circuit this Wednesday.
Additional reports have arisen regarding former FBI Director James Comey's interactions with President Trump. President Trump tweeted that the appointment of a special prosecutor to helm the Russia investigation was a "witch hunt." Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told the Senate that he knew Comey would be fired before he authored the memo used as justification for the firing. And former Senator Joe Lieberman may be the frontrunner to replace Comey.
Discussion continued about whether the President obstructed justice and can, or should, be removed from office. The Department of Justice appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the allegations of collusion between Russia and Trump's campaign. In other news, reports emerged that immigration officials are looking for increased discretion in immigration hearings, and several commentators at this blog propose a solution to resolve the Gavin Grimm case about access to restrooms for transgender students.