Updates | The Week of May 1, 2017

Matthew Stephenson offers an in-depth analysis of credible allegations that the Administration is exploiting public power for private gain (Take Care).

Arguments against standing in the CREW v. Trump emoluments litigation rest upon distinctions without a difference, explains Leah Litman on Take Care.

Concerns about President Trump’s business ties abroad, including to Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, raise questions about the administration’s foreign policy goals (Politico)

Tags:

Emoluments

Recently on Take Care

Displaying Gender on ID—Admin Law Solutions for Con Law Problems

Harper Jean Tobin // 2/25/21 // Commentary

Washington D.C.’s Second-Class Status is a Stain on Our Democracy

David Gans // 2/25/21 // Commentary

Covid at the Court: South Bay United Pentecostal

Leah Litman // 2/6/21 // Quick Reactions

Versus Trump: The End...Or The Beginning?

Charlie Gerstein, Easha Anand, Jason Harrow // 1/23/21 // Commentary

Versus Trump: The Aftermath + Interview with Joshua Matz

Charlie Gerstein, Jason Harrow // 1/11/21 // Commentary

Versus Trump: The Electoral College Votes

Charlie Gerstein, Jason Harrow // 12/26/20 // Commentary

Updates | The Week of January 22, 2018

1/28/18 // Daily Update

A federal district judge in Maryland heard arguments in a case brought by several state attorneys general contending that President Trump's business interests violate the Emoluments Clause.

Derek Reinbold

Update | The Week of November 27, 2017

12/4/17 // Daily Update

Michael Flynn's work on behalf of the Turkish government figures into Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of the Trump campaign.

Jeffrey Stein

Columbia Law School

Updates | The Week of October 23, 2017

10/31/17 // Daily Update

The DOJ reversed its prior concession that the Foreign Emoluments Clause applies to the President. Oral arguments in the first Emoluments Clause challenge lingered on whether the issue is a nonjusticiable political question.

Eve Levin