//  9/28/17  //  Commentary

On this week’s episode of Versus Trump, Easha, Jason, and Charlie dive into the merits of a lawsuit brought by Twitter users who have been blocked by @realDonaldTrump. They claim the President's blocking violates the First Amendment. 

The episode begins with an explanation of the case, including what the plaintiffs said on Twitter to get themselves blocked, what the effects of the President's Twitter block are, and the general rules of the road under the First Amendment. We then [at 16:00] dive into a deep debate about whether the President's tweets and actions using the @realDonaldTrump account is definitely government action, or whether he might be doing this tweeting and blocking in his personal capacity. It gets feisty! After that, we move on [at 35:00] to the constitutional effects of the block itself.

The episode concludes [at 46:00] with a couple of Trump nuggets.

As usual, you can listen online below, and subscribe here with any podcast player or here in iTunes.

Please share or provide feedback, and rate us in iTunes. You can find us at @VersusTrumpPod on twitter, or send us an email at versustrumppodcast@gmail.com. 

Links

  • The Knight Institute’s case page for this case is here. The Complaint is here.
  • Amanda Shanor has written about this case multiple times on Take Care, including here and here.
  • We repeatedly discussed the decision in Davison v. Loudon County. The decision is here, and a Slate article about it is here. (An unintentionally funny press release by the County that valiantly tries to spin a clear loss into a win is here.)
  • Noah Feldman's argument that Trump's Twitter blocking isn't government action is here. Eugene Volokh's similar argument is here.
  • We talked about Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of Univ. of Va., in which Justice Kennedy introduces the notion of the metaphysical public forum, and Heffernan v. City of Paterson, which stands for the proposition that the First Amendment prohibits even government action that has no effect on an individual's free speech rights.
  • Trump Nuggets: Here's Buzzfeed on Steve Bannon infiltrating Facebook, and here's excerpts of what Coach Popovich said about Trump.

Versus Trump: Trump Loses On Family Planning, Wins In The Ninth, and More

5/16/19  //  Uncategorized

This week on Versus Trump, Jason and Easha go through a few updates to cases involving Title X, which provides money for family planning; the Administration's policy to have many asylum applicants removed to Mexico; and the controversial border wall. Trump lost one, won one—for now, and hasn't yet gotten a decision in the third. Listen now!

Jason Harrow

Equal Citizens

Easha Anand

San Francisco

Versus Trump: Trump Versus Trump's Banks

5/9/19  //  Uncategorized

This week on Versus Trump, Jason, Charlie, and Easha discuss a new lawsuit by the President seeking to prevent two banks from responding to Congressional subpoenas that seek information about the his business dealings. Listen now!

Charlie Gerstein

Civil Rights Corps

Jason Harrow

Equal Citizens

Easha Anand

San Francisco

Versus Trump: 2-For-39

5/2/19  //  Commentary

This week on Versus Trump, Jason discusses some fascinating research about how the Trump Administration has fared in the courts with Bethany Davis Noll, the Litigation Director at the Institute for Policy Integrity. They discuss challenges to Trump's regulatory agenda, why the Administration is losing at a historic rate, what is slipping through the cracks, and what come next. Listen now!

Jason Harrow

Equal Citizens