Updates | The Week of April 24, 2017

An amicus brief filed by constitutional scholars in the Muslim Ban cases offers a compelling alternative basis for invalidating Trump's executive order (The Economist).

Joshua Matz is counsel of record on this amicus brief (Take Care)
C-SPAN will live-broadcast the Fourth Circuit's oral argument (ABA Journal).
Trump’s motives for the travel ban matter under existing law, argues Richard Primus (Take Care).

Tags:

Executive Orders

Recently on Take Care

Displaying Gender on ID—Admin Law Solutions for Con Law Problems

Harper Jean Tobin // 2/25/21 // Commentary

Washington D.C.’s Second-Class Status is a Stain on Our Democracy

David Gans // 2/25/21 // Commentary

Covid at the Court: South Bay United Pentecostal

Leah Litman // 2/6/21 // Quick Reactions

Versus Trump: The End...Or The Beginning?

Charlie Gerstein, Easha Anand, Jason Harrow // 1/23/21 // Commentary

Versus Trump: The Aftermath + Interview with Joshua Matz

Charlie Gerstein, Jason Harrow // 1/11/21 // Commentary

Versus Trump: The Electoral College Votes

Charlie Gerstein, Jason Harrow // 12/26/20 // Commentary

Updates | The Week of January 22, 2018

1/28/18 // Daily Update

Michael Dorf argued that litigation against the travel ban should be considered a success, regardless of the final result at the Supreme Court. A report shows that Customs and Border Protection repeatedly violated court orders issued during the first week of the travel ban litigation.

Derek Reinbold

Updates | The Week of January 15, 2018

1/14/18 // Daily Update

A federal court grants an injunction requiring the Trump Administration to resume accepting Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals renewal applications.

Take Care

Update | The Week of November 27, 2017

12/4/17 // Daily Update

President Trump's recent tweets may not help the government's defense of the latest iteration of the Travel Ban.

Jeffrey Stein

Columbia Law School