//  6/21/17  //  Latest Developments

Originally published in the Lincoln Journal Star 

I recently wrote an open letter to Senator Ben Sasse regarding the American Health Care Act.  

You can read the full letter here.

I conclude:

Our republic relies on an informed citizenry that communicates with and watches over those who exercise power. People who care about responsible citizenship -- as you do -- often point out the dangers of an underinformed public, one that lets officials escape the accountability that is supposed to keep them honest. It’s hard to see how the public can play its role if officials deliberately keep us in the dark.

Deliberately keeping the public ignorant of the legislative process does not show respect for the American people. Or for democracy itself. You know that, too.

So I am writing to you, senator, because so much that you have said indicates that you will stand up for decent behavior in politics and work against the excessive partisanship that harms our constitutional system.

You have a choice. Either you can be the wise, mature citizen-legislator whose admirable values you articulate so well, or you can stay quiet while Senate leadership engages in this breathtaking undermining of democratic values. You can’t do both.

You are entitled to dislike the Affordable Care Act and to vote for its repeal. That’s democracy, too. But if you go along quietly as the Senate majority adopts controversial legislation without even giving the public time to read and react to the bill, your admirable high-road discourse will become considerably less credible.

That would be so disappointing.

I think you're a good man, senator. The choice is yours, and I hope you make it well.


The Affordable Care Act Does Not Have An Inseverability Clause

11/5/20  //  In-Depth Analysis

Contrary to challengers’ claim, Congress nowhere directed the Supreme Court to strike down the entire ACA if the individual mandate is invalidated. Congress knows how to write an inseverability directive, and didn’t do it here. That, combined with Congress’s clear actions leaving the ACA intact and the settled, strong presumption in favor of severability, make this an easy case for a Court that is proud of its textualism.

Abbe R. Gluck

Yale Law School

The Real Problem with Seila

8/24/20  //  In-Depth Analysis

Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that tenure protection for the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional. The decision’s reasoning may be more important—and worrisome—than the holding itself.

Zachary Price

U.C. Hastings College of the Law

Roberts’ Rules: How the Chief Justice Could Rein in Police Abuse of Power 

8/19/20  //  In-Depth Analysis

A theme of Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinions this past term is that courts should not employ open-ended balancing tests to protect fundamental constitutional rights. Yet there is one area of the Supreme Court’s constitutional jurisprudence that is rife with such amorphous balancing tests: policing. It is long past time for the Court to revisit this area of law.